Peer Review Growth Mindet and Teacher Challenges Parent
Open up access peer-reviewed affiliate
Parental Appointment in Children'southward Learning: A Holistic Approach to Teacher-Parents' Partnerships
Submitted: September tenth, 2019 Reviewed: September 20th, 2019 Published: October 28th, 2019
DOI: x.5772/intechopen.89841
IntechOpen Downloads
1,328
Full Chapter Downloads on intechopen.com
Abstract
This study presents the standpoint of parental appointment, conceptualized past Janet Goodall and collaborators, every bit a framework that is coherent to the principles of the holistic arroyo of pedagogy to teacher-parents' partnerships. We bring frontwards the evolution of the concept of parental engagement and its main standpoints, in relation to more traditional theories on parental involvement. We also talk over previous findings about teachers' and parents' roles in education and teacher-parents' partnerships, as well as how practise changes in educational paradigms challenge home-school collaboration. Finally, the commodity highlights the need to implement research-based parental engagement practices in educational systems around the world.
Keywords
- parental date
- parental involvement
- teacher-parents partnership
- teacher-parents dialog
- home-school collaboration
- holistic didactics
- children'due south learning
*Address all correspondence to: cristiana.levinthal@helsinki.fi
1. Introduction
Partnerships between parents and teachers regarding students' education accept been a well-researched topic throughout the past three decades. Much more recently, both research and practice contexts started adapting their perspectives on the centrality of the parents' role in their children'due south learning [1, ii, three, 4, 5]. Such a shift is embedded in a mainstream worldwide tendency to conform the goals of educational systems to an e'er-changing and globalized world, targeting to develop not only competences in individual fields of knowledge, merely also transversal competences, such as, for example, learning to acquire, cultural competence, and entrepreneurship [1]. These changes, stimulated by the latest educational reflections within the scope of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [5] are deeply framed by the holistic approach in teaching.
In pedagogy, the holistic approach refers to the development of the whole pupil, underlining all the dimensions in which he/she tin acquire and abound as an individual, for instance, cerebral, social, emotional, and spiritual dimensions [6]. This arroyo faces such dimensions every bit interdependently relevant to the well-being, healthy development, and success of the student and carries the notion that each educatee is the expert that guides his/her ain learning process in life [vii]. The adoption of a holistic arroyo in instruction requires, consequently, a role re-conceptualization of both teachers and parents.
It is important to address that, in this article,
Advertising
ii. From involvement to engagement
There is a consensus in research regarding the favorable impact of parents' positive attitudes and behavior toward their children'south learning, schooling, and schools [8, ix, ten, 11]. Indisputably, research has shown that such parents' emplacement impacts positively students' academic achievement as well equally learning in a broader sense [10, 12, 13, 14]. Yet, such a gear up of desirable parents' attitudes and behavior has been conceptualized in numerous different ways. Researchers are far from unified regarding the terms then are school professionals. The nigh traditional termination to describe various types of parents' participation in education is
Research on parental involvement in education has generally focused on the positive repercussion parental involvement has in students' achievement, achievement-related self-perceptions, and autonomous motivation [8, 11, 15, 16, 17, eighteen]. Thus, in that location has been agreement that parental involvement is a multidimensional construct. On the other hand, most of the inquiry conducted on involvement in the by decades is based on influential frameworks that conceptualize it in terms of parents' participation in children'south schools or schooling, in other words, in the processes
Grolnick and Slowiaczeck [11] have stated the importance of integrating both educational and developmental constructs in the perspective of involvement, underlining the significance of
-
behavioral, (eastward.grand., participating in activities promoted by the school, such every bit parents' evening);
-
personal (e.m., positive kid-parent affective interactions about and around schoolhouse, such as parents' assistance with homework);
-
cognitive-intellectual (e.g., exposure to cerebral-stimulating events and materials, such as books, that would help the children practise skills
useful in their schooling, like reading).
Later, Joyce Epstein [9] postulated a 6-type model for parental involvement. In her model, Epstein underlines the concept of partnerships between parents and educators numerous times and calls for school staff's cardinal role in involving parents. Her framework includes (i) parenting; (two) communicating; (3) volunteering; (four) learning at dwelling house; (five) decision making; and (6) collaborating with community. Epstein's framework [ix] seems to pursuit an even more home- and parent-related standpoint for bookish success, enhancing the value of the dwelling context and figures. Within each of the half-dozen types of interest, the writer highlights, based in a solid cluster of inquiry findings, numerous advantages of involving parents in schools—for students, for teachers and for parents themselves [9].
Despite of viewing interest from the perspective of ecological systems theory [21], because various organisation levels that influence children'south development (eastward.g., family, school, and community), Epstein'southward model is withal school-centered, attached to a perspective of fulfillment of schools' needs and academic success of the students. For example, regarding the first type of involvement described in the model,
The models of Grolnick and Slowiaczeck and Epstein highlight two main domains of involvement:
In contempo years, the torso of enquiry pointing to the centrality of effective teacher-parent communication and partnership have begun to expand consistently [23, 24], giving parental interest a more family unit-centered arroyo and, consequently, questioning the involvement-concept and its adequacy. It has been strongly suggested that the termination
In parallel, the term parental engagement has been gaining space in enquiry on home-schoolhouse partnerships and shedding new lights on the topic [4, 25, 26, 27, 28], mostly in the United States and the United Kingdom. This is the case especially regarding studies focused on parental involvement from a comprehensive signal of view, seeking to empathize not only the parental role in academic success but as well their role in teacher-parent communication and parent–kid interactions outside the academic sphere (e.m., parenting styles and non-academic related activities away from school) [29, thirty]. Similar perspectives can be found on educational policies documents of international organizations [31, 32].
From that standpoint and based on several findings and influential theories [33, 34], Goodall and Montgomery [x] congenital an original upwardly-to-appointment framework on parental engagement, where previous parental involvement practices are included and extended.
Goodall and Montgomery's model [ten] places accent on parents' human relationship with their children and their children's learning, in
Goodall and Montgomery'due south model presupposes that the children's learning occurs in all varieties of contexts that largely surpass the school surround, giving the abode environment and experiences, as well as other contexts mediated by parents, an enormous relevance every bit children's learning scenarios. This model is presented as a
Tabular array 1.
Summary of the parental engagement continuum framework.
Note: The data was extracted from Goodall and Montgomery [ten] and compiled past the writer of the present article.
Past observing the information in Table ane, it becomes clearer that the third point of the continuum, parental appointment, integrates the positive characteristics of the previous ii points, since information technology portraits an
Thus, through this model's lenses, a true teacher-parent relationship encompasses reciprocal open up mindsets, where both teachers and parents acquire from each other, show mutual interest in what each other has to say, and have a genuine concern about not only the schooling success, but near all other life contexts that are significant for the kid. Here, parents' levels of expertise on their own children are valued past teachers and their role is elevated, both teachers' and parents' perspectives thing and both have
The presented framework allows analysis and comprehension of the of import relationships between parents and teachers, regarding the children'southward learning, from a holistic perspective. The discussion
Nonetheless, it is important to address that the third point, as well as the whole continuum dynamics, refers to an platonic framework, ane that parents and, especially, teachers should aim to [10].
two.1 Teachers' role on parental appointment
Although
Teachers are central stakeholders in education and institute cohorts of powerful agents for modify, due to their training, specialization, and experience [12, 36]. Teachers' psychological and behavioral characteristics regarding the involvement of parents have been strongly associated to parents' actual interest [8, 30, 37]. Additionally, although teachers are more successful in involving parents during the initial levels of schooling [38, 39], they continue to act equally primal figures for parental engagement throughout all levels of children'southward academic life, especially regarding difficult pupils and hard to reach families [forty, 41, 42].
Research has evidenced that teachers consider families' involvement important to the students' schoolhouse success, recognizing that parents are positive contributors. Howbeit, the majority of these studies focused on the home-based academical interest of parents (e.one thousand., reinforcement of the learning that occurs in school, specially in supporting homework at home), pointing out such forms as the most valued types of parental involvement [43, 44, 45, 46, 47].
In different cultures, teachers' conceptualizations and practices have been focused on and proven to be crucial to parental involvement, in detail for those parents who have difficulties in being involved [41, 42]. These include the emotional climate experienced when teachers and parents collaborate, including the time dedicated to effective advice and dialog, only too other aspects, such as teachers' self-efficacy and part behavior, expectations about involvement and specific practices to promote involvement [13, 37, 48, 49, 50, 51].
Improving dwelling-schoolhouse constructive communication has been identified as a primary way to enhance trust betwixt teachers and parents, likewise as has the
Much of what is considered to be structurally necessary for an effective dialog in teacher-parent interactions lies in the teachers' prepare of competences such equally managing the time dedicated to talk to and
Parental involvement is greater when parents feel that teachers include them and value their contributions [37, 56]. In fact, teachers whose expectations are that the parents can contribute to the children's learning are more likely to involve parents than those teachers who have low expectations on the competences of their students' parents [13, 54, 57]. Teachers' back up of parents to learn how to help their children is appreciated by parents [54] and teachers' invitations for involvement are positively responded by parents [30], which gives teachers' solicitations an of import and predicting role on the dynamics of parental date. Additionally, teachers' self-efficacy perceptions on parental involvement has been significantly related to involvement itself, likewise functioning as a predictor [11]. These studies approve the importance of student teachers having an academic path that highlights parental engagement strategies and attitudes.
On the other mitt, and despite agreeing that home-school collaborations are essentially of import, teachers and parents differ in stance near the extent in which each other actually see their expectations. Inquiry has shown that oft teachers and parents have incongruent parents' role perceptions and that teachers await parents to perform bookish-related tasks in the home more frequently than parents do themselves, both in primary and secondary levels [43]. This adds, in one case more, to the evidence on the power teachers practise accept, to change the perspective from
2.2 Parents' role on parental engagement
Parent's influences on their children's achievement take been largely studied [eight, 11, 16, 18]. Factors like parents' socioeconomic status and educational background are known to human activity as predictors of students' achievement and schoolhouse accommodation, equally well as of parental involvement [9, 42, 58]. Literature is likewise consequent nearly the positive response from parents toward their children's learning, regarding teachers' expectations and solicitations of parental involvement [13, 37, 49, 50], which is believed to contribute to the parents' role of themselves and for them to view their own participation equally important, through the teachers' eyes.
However, in comparison to research on teachers' role and perceptions or studies where both teachers' and parents' attributes are analyzed regarding children's bookish success, only more recently, parents' part and perceptions started gaining significant space as objects of study on parental involvement [19, 59, 60]. That can be explained, in some extent, due to the history of school and home contexts' instituted views of each other as entities with unlike and complementary objectives [52, 61], where children'due south schooling was a school duty and children'due south basic well-being and good for you development was attributed solely to parents. Lately, as these ii tremendous tasks increasingly merge into each other, the function of parents' attitudes and behavior is beingness progressively more taken into account, from a holistic betoken of view.
Today, we know that parents who believe that their ain part is important in affecting their child's achievement in schoolhouse tend to more often facilitate the development of their child'southward interests, in comparison to parents who practice non view their role as of import [xx]. Role behavior identified in research are, in office, related to what modern expectancy-value theory refers as task-value [62]. Chore-value beliefs are fundamental determinants of option, persistence, and engagement in tasks. Eccles and Wigfield [62] outlined four components of job-value: attainment value, intrinsic value, utility value, and costs. Regarding parental engagement, these components would refer to (a) the personal importance the parent would attribute for positively contributing to their child's learning; (b) the genuine enjoyment the parent would feel about doing so; (c) the relation the parent attributes betwixt positively contributing to their children's learning and their own personal goals in life; and (d) the corporeality of effort or negative experiences a parent feels they accept to get through in social club to practice so.
Recent findings point out that enjoyment and genuine interest of parents well-nigh their children's learning take life-long positive impacts. Parents who read recreationally to their children at young age and who talk informally to their adolescent children around a table, virtually political or social issues, are more than likely to have a significant impact on children'south life and school outcomes than those parents who practice non [32]. These kinds of
Diverse authors [two, 22, thirty, 63, 64] accept recently studied the impact of parental styles at habitation. Goodall [2] points to the
As the role of parents in engaging in children'due south learning is acknowledged to be such an essential element in the children'due south lives, in and exterior schoolhouse, inquiry also underlines the existence of a blueprint in the quality of the kid'due south affective relationship with parents and with teachers, since children seem to take a concordant evocative impact on both parents and teachers [14]. This gives teacher-parents' partnerships even more centrality, one time teachers, every bit professional educators, have opportunity to identify and break such patterns when they are not effective for the child'south sake [24, 65, 66]. In such cases, teachers have the ability to cover more complex home dynamics such as those of students from diverse cultural or socioeconomic backgrounds,
2.3 Challenges for parental date
Surpassing the sphere of children's academic achievement or school engagement, teacher-parents' partnerships are nowadays seen as a powerful tool for breaking undesirable patterns. It has been considered an extremely important element on disinterestedness issues in instruction when built on effective teacher-parent dialog [xl, 42]. Yet, this scenario is not prevalent in virtually schools effectually the world, since, as Goodall [iii] attests, the most popular perception of working with parents is still
Despite the growing cognition regarding parental engagement in a larger sense, ane of not-dependence of the school surroundings, many are the obstacles for engagement to take identify in schools and homes effectually the earth. Some of them have been effectually longer than the others, which brand it even more difficult for the school community to tackle them, as they seem to pile upward. For instance, the lack of resources such as fourth dimension and personnel, in many schools, prevents teachers from developing consequent approaches for parental involvement itself, let lone practices of appointment, that demand an even superior amount of time and follow-up dialogue between teachers and parents. Some of the linger drawbacks for involvement and appointment practices also list: lack of support from schools' administration or simply a set of schoolhouse's beliefs that do non favor teacher-parents' partnerships; mothers' over fathers' representativeness in schools; and difficulty of maintaining or establishing constructive home-schoolhouse dialogue throughout the levels of schooling.
Regarding the institutional level, leaders such as the schoolhouse's headmaster or department's head teachers may or may not adopt a facilitator function to involving and engaging parents [67]. For the engagement path to be accessible, information technology is essential that a consistent definition of parental engagement is shared betwixt school'south assistants, teachers, and parents of a specific school, and so all these cohorts are able to develop realist and shared expectations virtually each other's roles [68]. Thus, headmasters and head teachers have a decisive role on the development of a school culture which values the engagement of parents in the children's learning [69].
Such school's guidelines can also make a difference in engaging
Another well-known stumbling rock for parental engagement, that is cited higher up, constitutes the difficulty of maintaining or creating instructor-parents' partnerships every bit children grow in age and grade level. As children develop into immature adults, the nature of their relationships with adults and peers changes, as they look forrad to a progressively more than independent life, which originates a growing distance between teacher and parents dialogs [73]. Additionally, in almost countries, as children progress in teaching, the number of teachers abound, fact that also handicaps teachers-parents' partnerships and holistic didactics. In that affair, Goodall [35] encourages that schools explore the numerous possibilities technology provides for engagement of parents of older students every bit well as busier or hard to reach parents (e.grand., email, texting, and specific channels of communication).
Technology transports us to a more than recent range of challenges for parental engagement, together with multifariousness in classrooms and instructor education programs.
Despite the lack of research in the topic, that, every bit Goodall [35] herself attests, consists in a very difficult theme to report accordingly, the transformation in the major routes of advice between teachers and parents has crucially changed in the last few years. In Finland, for case, digital advice has get the primary means for teachers and parents to communicate [74]. The advance and accessibility of technology consist of an advantage for parental engagement, when the tools are well used by professionals, for example, equally it helps professionals to communicate with parents more than efficiently and reach a higher number of parents in a lilliputian amount of fourth dimension [35]. However, these practices arm-twist new and unknown difficulties that need to be outpaced by schools. Equally pointed out in Finland [74], such strategies may shorten distances with a specific group of parents, such equally the ones from rural contexts, merely other groups may feel they are not given plenty infinite to communicate equally teachers would recollect. The lack of substantial education of teachers on how to use engineering to improve instructor-parents dialogue, during their trainings, needs to exist tackled in order to bring schools and homes together [35, 74].
In fact, teacher instruction needs reflections and updates in many parts of the earth. In Portugal, for case, only 39% of lower secondary teachers reported feeling prepared, past the time they had finished their studies, to teach in cognitively diverse settings and 27% reported a potent need to receive formal education in this area [75]. Classroom diversity certainly challenges teachers, often causing tense relationships to emerge with parents. To answer this and other flaws, a huge educational reform based on a holistic approach has been recently implemented past the Portuguese government [76], fifty-fifty though no additional training for practitioners accept been made available, so far.
Finally, and because instruction needs to be approached from an ecological systems perspective [21], ane of the greater challenges for parental engagement dwells not only in the classroom, but in the customs and the society. Along with globalization, teachers all effectually the globe must deal with a rising diverseness of students and parents, which demands teachers to take a artistic, sensitive, and versatile attitude toward parents. Such variety requires a greater corporeality of resources from the teacher than information technology does in cases where he/she deals with more uniform groups of children.
Advertisement
3. Conclusions
In a primary contact, parental engagement may seem complex and sometimes fifty-fifty utopic. The holistic arroyo to pedagogy calls for a holistic approach to teacher-parents' partnerships and vice-versa: ane cannot fully achieve its goals without the other. Information technology is probably one of the main reasons it has been so difficult even for well-intentioned and well-educated teachers to innovate engagement practices and to break the traditional cycles where schools ask parents for more than they tin can give and the whole family ends up feeling frustrated.
Later on a closer look, one may realize date practices accept, in fact, a uncomplicated foundation. It is based on accurate interactions, true acceptance, trust, and believe in bringing out the best of each family unit; it goes beyond interacting as instructor and parents—rather, refers to interacting as whole individuals that are sensitive nearly each other'south needs, beliefs, and ideas and instead of competing with each other, unify their strengths for the common goal of the child'due south success in life.
For a teacher of a holistic classroom surroundings who wants to develop a closer and an accurate partnership with his/her pupil'due south parents, there is a need to preserve his/her mental attitude in the classroom, reflecting it in the interactions with the parents [3]. If the teacher has the goal to prompt the development of the student as a whole person, and so, first, the teacher needs to
Across all challenges presented before, it has been difficult to move from an
Notwithstanding, every bit stated in a higher place, engaging parents demands a deep reflexive attitude from the teacher—i that nigh probable develops through practice and meaningful internalization processes of cognition [78]. "Beginning teachers need to exist encouraged to develop a moral stance in relation to their professional responsibilities" ([78], p. 33) in order to meaningfully develop the power and sensitiveness to stablish authentic partnerships with all parents. The teacher's professional person knowledge will reveal itself in pedagogical decisions that cannot be dissociated from his/her own principles and values. This means that each pupil teacher'southward path volition be unique and will be shaped by the formal education they will receive, the thoughts and discussions they will encounter during this menstruation, and the moral choices regarding values and principles they will brand forth the way.
A purposeful teacher looks for not simply fulfilling his/her own goals in life but has a profound sense of across-the-self impact and self-transcendent goals [79]. Teacher instruction tin establish optimal contexts to foster student teachers' sense of purpose in life and in educational activity, self-cognition, and reflection power. Methods that involve guided analysis, group, and individual reflections and are based on authentic cases from pupil teachers' past experiences in school [79] seem to offer a promising wellspring for teaching how to appoint parents. This could involve, for instance, student teachers' recollection of memorable learning experiences with their parents, reflection about the meaning and impact it had in their studying-learning process and reflection nearly their teachers' attitude toward parents at the time.
Practitioners' and researchers' efforts, through inquiry-based practices and practice-based research, are crucial in giving life to such a framework in schools and homes, more and more than as years go by, and making the holistic approach more a
References
- one.
Finnish National Board of Instruction (FNBE). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Vol. 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Teaching Publications; 2016 - two.
Goodall J. Parental engagement to back up children's learning: A six betoken model. School Leadership & Management. 2013; 33 (2):133-150. DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2012.724668 - 3.
Goodall J. Learning-centred parental engagement: Freire reimagined. Educational Review. 2017; seventy (5):603-621. DOI: x.1080/00131911.2017.1358697 - 4.
Goodall J. Parental engagement and arrears discourses: Absolving the system and solving parents. Educational Review. 2019:i-thirteen. DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2018.1559801 - 5.
System for Economical Co-operation and Evolution (OECD). The Future of Educational activity and Skills—Educational activity 2030. OECD Publishing; 2018. DOI: 10.1787/1d0bc92a-en [Net]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%twenty(05.04.2018).pdf [Accessed: 2019-06-fifteen] - 6.
Tirri K. Holistic school pedagogy and values: Finnish teachers' and students' perspectives. International Periodical of Educational Research. 2011; 50 (3):159-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2011.07.010 - 7.
Ricci C, Pritscher C. Holistic Pedagogy: The Cocky and Quality Willed Learning. New York: Springer; 2015. 226 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14944-8_19 - viii.
Eccles J. Families, schools and developing accomplishment motivations and engagement. In: Grusec J, Hastings P, editors. Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research. New York: The Guilford Printing; 2007. pp. 665-691 - 9.
Epstein JL. School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Bedrock: Westview Printing; 2001. 624 p - 10.
Goodall J, Montgomery C. Parental involvement to parental engagement: A continuum. Educational Review. 2014; 66 (4):399-410. DOI: ten.1080/00131911.2013.781576 - eleven.
Grolnick WS, Slowiaczek ML. Parents' involvement in children's schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development. 1994; 65 :237-252. DOI: 10.2307/1131378 - 12.
Epstein JL. School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Westview Printing; 2011. 656 p - 13.
Hoover-Dempsey K, Bassler O, Brissie J. Explorations in parent-schoolhouse relations. Journal of Educational Research. 1992; 85 (2):287-294. DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1992.9941128 - fourteen.
Silinskas G, Kiuru N, Aunola One thousand, Lerkkanen MK, Nurmi JE. The developmental dynamics of children'due south academic performance and mothers' homework-related affect and practices. Developmental Psychology. 2015; 51 (4):419-433. DOI: 10.1037/a0038908 - 15.
Hill N, Tyson D. Parental interest in middle Schoolhouse: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology. 2009; 45 :740-763. DOI: x.1037/a0015362 - 16.
Hoover-Dempsey KV, Sandler HM. Parental involvement in children'southward education: Why does it make a divergence? Teachers College Record. 1995; 97 (ii):310-331 - 17.
Pacheco P, Mata L. Literacia familiar—Crenças de pais de crianças em idade pré-escolar e características das práticas de literacia na família. [Family unit literacy—Behavior of parents of preschool historic period children and characteristics of family literacy practices]. Análise Psicológica. 2013; 3-XXXI :217-234. DOI: ten.14417/S0870-8231201300030001 - 18.
Peixoto F, Carvalho R. Parental attitudes toward academic achievement: Effects on motivation, self-concept and school accomplishment. In: Wosnitza M, Karabenick SA, Efklides A, Nenniger P, editors. Contemporary Motivation Research: From Global to Local Perspectives. Göttingen & New York: Hogrefe & Huber; 2009. pp. 279-297 - 19.
Böök ML, Perälä-Littunen Southward. Responsibility in home-schoolhouse relations—Finnish parents' views. Children & Society. 2015; 29 :615-625. DOI: 10.1111/chso.12099 - xx.
Georgiou SN. Parental attributions as predictors of involvement and influences on child achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999; 69 (3):409-429. DOI: ten.1348/000709999157806 - 21.
Bronfenbrenner U. The Environmental of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge: Harvard Academy Press; 1979. 330 p - 22.
Mata L, Pedro I, Peixoto F. Parental support, student motivational orientation and achievement. The Impact of Emotions. International Journal of Emotional Education. 2018; 10 (2):77-92 - 23.
Epstein JL, Sheldon SB. Moving forrard: Ideas for inquiry on School, Family, and customs partnerships. In: SAGE Handbook for Research in Education: Engaging Ideas and Enriching Inquiry. London: Sage Publications; 2006. pp. 117-138 - 24.
Sabol TJ, Pianta R. Recent trends in inquiry on teacher-kid relationships. Attachment & Human Development. 2012; xiv (3):213-231. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2012.672262 - 25.
Chen J, Pisani L, White Southward, Soroui J. Parental engagement in early childhood didactics at dwelling house. Reading Psychology. 2012; 33 :497-524. DOI: 10.1080/02702711.2012.703038 - 26.
Fenton P, Ocasio-Stoutenburg L, Harry B. The ability of date: Sociocultural considerations in the quest for equity. Theory Into Practice. 2017; 56 :214-225. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2017.1355686 - 27.
Fretwell N, Osgood J, O'Toole Thousand, Tsouroufli M. Governing through trust: Community-based link workers and parental appointment in education. British Educational Research Journal. 2018; 44 (6):1047-1063. DOI: 10.1002/berj.3478 - 28.
Harris A, Goodall J. Removing obstacles: Achieving inclusive arroyo to Parental engagement. Curriculum Briefing. 2006; five (one):17-19 - 29.
Silinskas G, Niemi P, Lerkkanen M, Nurmi J. Children'due south poor academic performance evokes parental homework help—Just does it assist? International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2012; 37 (1):44-56. DOI: 10.1177/0165025412456146 - xxx.
Souto-Manning K, Swick KJ. Teachers' beliefs nigh parent and family involvement: Rethinking our family involvement epitome. Early on Childhood Education Periodical. 2006; 34 (2):187-193. DOI: 10.1007/s10643-006-0063-5 - 31.
European Comission. National Reforms in School Instruction—Portugal [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/national-reforms-school-education-53_en [Accessed: 2019-06-xv] - 32.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Let's Read Them a Story! The Parent Cistron in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2012. DOI: 10.1787/9789264176232-en [Net]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264176232-en.pdf?expires=1567713726&id=id&accname=invitee&checksum=1F88820C7C1430DD5AA0F21D65C66319 [Accessed: 2019-06-15] - 33.
Dewey J. Experience and education. The Educational Forum. 1986; l (iii):241-252 - 34.
Freire P. Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Didactics of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum; 1994. 240 p - 35.
Goodall J. Technology and school-abode communication. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning. 2016; 11 (two):118-131. DOI: ten.1080/22040552.2016.1227252 - 36.
Molina SC. Family, schoolhouse, community engagement, and partnerships: An area of continued enquiry and growth. Teaching Education. 2013; 24 (2):235-238. DOI: x.1080/10476210.2013.786894 - 37.
Hoover-Dempsey KV, Walker JMT, Sandler HM, Whetsel D, Greem CL, Wilkins As, et al. Why practice parents become involved? Enquiry findings and implications. Elementary School Journal. 2005; 106 (2):105-130. DOI: 10.1086/499194 - 38.
Costa Thousand, Faria L. Parenting and parental interest in secondary school: Focus groups with adolescents' parents. Paidéia. 2017; 27 :28-36. DOI: 10.1590/1982-43272767201704 - 39.
Eccles J, Harold RD. Family unit involvement in children'due south and adolescents' schooling. In: Berth A, Dunn JF, editors. Family unit-School Links: How Do they Affect Educational Outcomes? Mahwah: Erlbaum; 1996. pp. three-34 - 40.
Baquedano-Lopez P, Alexander RA, Hernandez SJ. Equity issues in parental and customs involvement in schools: What teacher educators demand to know. Review of Inquiry in Instruction. 2013; 37 (1):149-182. DOI: x.3102/0091732X12459718 - 41.
Goodall J. Narrowing the Achievement Gap: Parental Date with Children'due south Learning. 1st ed. London: Taylor and Francis; 2017. 182 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315672465 - 42.
Kim Y. Minority parental interest and school barriers: Moving the focus away from deficiencies of parents. Educational Research Review. 2009; iv (ii):lxxx-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2009.02.003 - 43.
Deslandes R, Rousseau N. Congruence betwixt teachers' and parents' role structure and expectations near their involvement in homework. International Journal about Parents in Didactics. 2007; 1 (0):108-116 - 44.
DePlanty J, Coulter-Kern R, Duchane K. Perceptions of parental involvement in academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Enquiry. 2007; 100 (6):361-368. DOI: 10.3200/JOER.100.6.361-368 - 45.
Oliveira JHB. Psicologia da Educação, Temas Complementares, Vol. 3. [Psychology of Education, Complementary Subjects, Vol. 3]. Legis Editora: Porto; 2009. 251 p - 46.
Patall E, Cooper H, Robinson JC. Parent interest in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research. 2008; 78 (iv):1039-1101. DOI: 10.3102/0034654308325185 - 47.
Silva P, Silva R, Rocha C. Relação Escola-Família. [School-family relationships]. Educação, Sociedade e Cultura. 1996; 6 :143-200 - 48.
Baum AC, McMurray-Schwarz P. Preservice teachers' beliefs about Family unit involvement: Implications for instructor didactics. Early Childhood Education Journal. 2004; 32 :57-61 - 49.
Designing DR, School I. Family, and community collaboration programs in Quebec, Canada. The Schoolhouse Community Periodical. 2006; 16 (1):81-106 - l.
Moroni S, Dumont H, Trautwein U, Niggli A, Baeriswyl F. The need to distinguish between quantity and quality in research on parental involvement: The case of parental help with homework. Periodical of Educational Research. 2015; 108 :417-431. DOI: x.1080/00220671.2014.901283 - 51.
Patrikakou EN, Weissberg RP. Parents' perceptions of teacher outreach and parent involvement in children'due south didactics. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community. 2000; 20 :103-119. DOI: 10.1300/J005v20n01_08 - 52.
Adams KS, Christenson KL. Trust and the family-school relationship: Examination of parent-teacher differences in simple and secondary grades. Journal of Schoolhouse Psychology. 2000; 38 :477-497. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4405(00)00048-0 - 53.
Christenson S, Reschly A, editors. Handbook of Schoolhouse-Family Partnerships. New York: Routledge; 2010. 546 p - 54.
Hoover-Dempsey KV, Walker JMT, Jones KP, Reed RP. Teachers involving parents (TIP): An in-service teacher education program for enhancing parental involvement. Teaching and Instructor Education. 2002; 18 (7):843-867. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00047-1 - 55.
De Coninck K, Valcke M, Vanderlinde R. A measurement of educatee teachers' parent-teacher advice competences: The design of a video-based musical instrument. Journal of Educational activity for Teaching. 2018; 44 (three):333-352. DOI: 10.1080/02607476.2018.1465656 - 56.
Epstein JL, Sanders MG. Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Periodical of Education. 2006; 81 (2):81-120. DOI: 10.1207/S15327930pje8102_5 - 57.
Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Command. New York: W. H. Freeman; 1997. 604 p - 58.
Hornby M, Witte CA. Survey of parental involvement in centre schools in New Zealand. Pastoral Intendance in Education. 2010; 28 (1):59-69. DOI: 10-1080/02643940903540363 - 59.
Cheminais R. Family Partinership Working – A Guide for Education Practitioners. London: Sage; 2011. 128 p - 60.
Harris A, Andrew-Power Grand, Goodall J. Do Parents Know they Affair? Raising Achievement through Parental Appointment. London: Continuum International Publishing Group; 2009. 123 p - 61.
Berger EH. Parent involvement: Yesterday and today. Elementary School Periodical. 1991; 92 (iii):209-219. DOI: x.1086/461648 - 62.
Eccles J, Wigfield A. Motivational behavior, values and goals. Annual Review Psychology. 2002; 53 :109-132. DOI: x.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 - 63.
Pomerantz E, Moorman EA, Litwack SD. The how, whom, and why of parents' interest in children's academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research. 2007; 77 (3):373-410. DOI: 10.3102/003465430305567 - 64.
Sikiö R, Siekkinen M, Holopainen Fifty, Silinskas G, Lerkkanen Thou, Nurmi J. Maternal parenting styles, homework help, and children's literacy development in language minority and Finnish-speaking families. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2017; 33 (2):235-250. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-017-0330-iv - 65.
Levinthal C. Vinculação na Sala de Aula: Concordância Entre os padrões de vinculação da criança Com os Pais e Com a Educadora [Attachment in the Classroom: Cyclopedia betwixt child's Attachment Patterns with the Parents and with the Kindergarten Teacher]. [chief'south Thesis]. Lisbon: ISPA—Instituto Universitário; 2014 - 66.
Veríssimo M, Torres Northward, Silva F, Fernandes C, Vaughn Be, Santos AJ. Children'due south representations of attachment and positive teacher-child relationships. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017; 8 :i-7. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02270 - 67.
Young C, Austin S, Growe R. Defining parental interest: Perceptions of school administrators. Educational activity. 2013; 133 (3):291-297 - 68.
Wilder S. Effects of parental involvement on academic accomplishment: A meta-synthesis. Educational Review. 2014; 66 (three):377-397. DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2013.780009 - 69.
Ferguson C. Organizing Family and Community Connections With Schools: How Do School Staff Build Meaningful Relationships With All Stakeholders? National Center for Family & Customs Connections with Schools. Southwest Educational Evolution Laboratory [Net]; 2005. pp. 1-seven. Available from: http://www.sedl.org/connections/resources/rb/rb4-Rel.pdf - 70.
Kikas E, Poikonen P, Kontoniemi K, Lyyra A, Lerkkanen Yard, Niilo A. Mutual trust between kindergarten teachers and mothers and its associations with family characteristics in Estonia and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2011; 55 (1):23-37. DOI: x.1080/00313831.2011.539852 - 71.
Silinskas G, Leppänen U, Aunola Thou, Parrila R, Nurmi J. Predictors of mothers' and fathers' teaching of reading and mathematics during kindergarten and form 1. Learning and Pedagogy. 2010; 20 (1):61-71. DOI: x.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.002 - 72.
Lamb ME. How do fathers influence children's development? Permit me count the ways. In: Lamb ME, editor. The Role of the Father in Child Evolution. 5th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010. pp. i-26 - 73.
Harris A, Goodall J. Do parents know they thing? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Enquiry. 2008; 50 :277-289 - 74.
Kuusimäki A, Uusitalo-Malmivaara Fifty, Tirri Chiliad. Parents' and teachers' views on digital communication in Finland. Education Research International. 2019:1-7. DOI: ten.1155/2019/8236786 - 75.
System for Economical Co-operation and Evolution (OECD). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. OECD Publishing; 2019. DOI: x.1787/1d0bc92a-en [Internet]. Bachelor from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/1d0bc92a-en/i/ane/two/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/1d0bc92a-en&_csp_=1418ec5a16ddb9919c5bc207486a271c&itemIGO=oecd&itemContentType=volume [Accessed 2019-06-20] - 76.
Direção-Geral de Ensino (DGE). Perfil dos Alunos à Saída da Escolaridade Obrigatória [Exit profile of students leaving compulsory teaching]. Lisbon: DGE; 2017. [Net]. Available from: https://dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Curriculo/Projeto_Autonomia_e_Flexibilidade/perfil_dos_alunos.pdf [Accessed: 2019-06-15] - 77.
Goodall J. Leading for parental date: Working towards partnership. Schoolhouse Leadership & Management. 2018; 38 (2):143-146. DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2018.1459022 - 78.
Gillies D. Developing the thoughtful practitioner. In: Peters MA, Cowie B, Menter I, editors. A Companion to Enquiry in Teacher Didactics. Singapore: Vocalizer; 2017. pp. 23-35 - 79.
Tirri K, Kuusisto East. How tin can purpose be taught? Periodical of Religious Education. 2016; 64 :101-112. DOI: ten.1007/s40839-017-0035-7
Submitted: September 10th, 2019 Reviewed: September 20th, 2019 Published: October 28th, 2019
© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This affiliate is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Source: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/69651
0 Response to "Peer Review Growth Mindet and Teacher Challenges Parent"
Post a Comment